Victoria d Petr Hungarian at the head of his young Tisa party in the elections held last year on April 12, he left 16 years after taking power from the now unstoppable Viktor Orbán. The leader of Fidesz, one of the main ideologues and promoters of illiberalism, left the anemic country because of corruption, a friend of the Kremlin and a recognized fifth column in the European Parliament.
In a speech that offered Domingo’s growing electoral victory, Magyar urged us to think about access to the European Union at the expense of relations with Moscow, Beijing and Washington. “We will long for a country that is not a sworn vassal”manifesting itself through the concept of high voltage vassalage on Hungarian soil.
Orbán has been accused, which has not been forgiven in this country, of being a pawn of Russian interests. Also from the states. She was one of the main critics, near rampant corruptionwhich they launch from the emerging Tisa side.
On the contrary, it took months for the ruling party to consciously try to accept and fight against the figure of the Hungarian, who by 2025 would be considered the main danger to Orbán’s continuity in the next elections. He insulted them in the cartels divided by the cities and towns of the whole country and presented him as gas instigator of public money in the Ukrainian war.
An inspiration is, for example, the one who often went out into the streets of Budapest during the winter. Zelenski, Von der Leyen and Magyar appeared by rolling 20,000-florin notes (the highest value in Hungarian currency) into a gold purse with text that read: “ŕk adókat emelnek és ukrán aranybudira költik a pénzed“(“Submit your impuestos and make your money on a Ukrainian gold plate”).
An advertising column in which the Hungarian was criticized as the valor of European interests in the Ukrainian war.
They shoot arrows from one side and the other, accusing each other of being the vessel of one power or the other. Magyar meant, according to Fidesz propaganda, a future in which Hungary follows the dictates of the European Unionincluding questions that the Hungarian mayor was against the official position of Brussels, such as immigration. On the other hand, his comrade with Moscú, a former strong oppressor, broke Orbán’s image.
Trauma that attacks the Hungarian land with the vessel designation given by various previous symbols. A territory used to being under foreign ruleIt is also about solving the intention of external control and claiming autonomy in the management and decision-making of one’s own country, which has never happened before.
The beginning of this rebellious spirit occurred in 1526, when the Hungarian king Louis II. he died fighting the invading Ottoman forces who had occupied the territory for more than 150 years and opened the doors to them for the first time. Habsburg they will be angry in the line of succession to the Hungarian crown.
Indeed, we were hot with the Austrian royal house. Despite Ottoman rule in the 17th century, Vienna dictated the rules of the old country as the next major dominion. But everything has its limits. From 1526, various Hungarian princes attempted to liberate Transylvania from Austria. Phew in 1848 when to finally go on tour in favor of Hungarian autonomy.
This year, as part of the revolutions that appeared in various European cities against the Habsburgs and Bourbons, the poet Sandor Petőfi a protest was held in Budapest where 12 points were demanded. Both petitions were a national guard proper, the convocation of a national assembly, or a more independent character vis-à-vis the Austrian Empire.
First, an aristocrat Lajos Kossuthanother great hero of the Hungarian homeland, tried to negotiate these claims at the Venetian court, before the capitulation of Ferdinand V, Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary. Among other things, God allowed the creation of an independent government, the burden of the first minister that Lajos Batthyány boasted about, and his own constitution.
However, the Hungarian complaints quickly acquired a bitter taste for the Habsburgs, which they perceived as they carefully strive for complete independence. Before the continued presence of the Austrian court, Batthyány’s government resigned and was replaced by Kossuth and his supporters, who sought a fully independent Hlánd.
When the Hungarian movement tried to expand its competence and organize its own military and political power, Viena responded. Hungría, no obstante, les plantó dear en open conflict that was at the point of collapse of the Empire. Finally, the movement was suppressed in 1849 and most of its supporters were executed. The only exception was Kossuth, who was exiled in the United Kingdom.
A rebellion without an embargo has important implications for the country’s future. The most significant event was in 1867, as I know it Austro-Hungarian Compromise. To prevent a similar situation occurring less than 20 years earlier, the Habsburgs authorized a series of structural reforms to achieve equality between Hungary and Austria. The Hungarians would share a common state with the Austrians, but their vessels would by no means appear to have just happened.
This moment of splendor came to an abrupt end just 50 years later. The end of the First World War, when the Hungarians lost in the band and became part of the crumbling empire, led to the new authorities of the deranged Hunger signing the treaty. Treaty of Trianon in 1920, the equivalent of the German signature at Versailles.
Under the terms of this text return is a loss two thirds of the territory of historical Hungary. Transylvania, the area that the Hungarians considered to be the land on which the country was founded, passed into the hands of Romania.
The city of Rijeka (today’s Fiume), the only one on the sea, was in dispute between Italy and the new Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, created by asymism between the regions that were previously part of the Kingdom of Hungary. The independence of Slovenia north of the Danube and the ceding of territory to Austria on the border were also agreed upon. Search for this item 3 million Hungarians quedaron outside the borders of his country.
Map of the proposed borders established by the Treaty of Trianon. In the center, historical hunger. Trazado with blue line, frontera hungara as it remains today. Photo: Wikimedia Commons
Fue Trianon una foreign taxation which still weighs heavily on the Hungarian consciousness. “For the people, the Treaty was an unprecedented shock, a great initial disaster,” says Hungarian historian Krisztián Ungváry in The Middle Kingdom Deutsche Welle. The result is the “Monument of National Unity” that Orbán erected in 2020 to commemorate the centenary of the treaty, a huge mural facing parliament that features the names of all the territories lost in 1920.
Hladovy also asked them to suffer from two important foreign influences in the following years. In World War II, Miklos HorthyAfter being forced into military rule in the country from 1920, he joined forces with the Nazis before promising to recover the lost territories at Trianon. However, when the Hungarian general tried to secretly negotiate a return with the Aliados, Hitler, discovering this, deposed him and took power from the Cruz Flechada, the Hungarian Nazi party responsible for the extermination of tens of thousands of Jews.
At the end of hostilities, it was the Soviet Union that took over the reins of Hungarian sovereignty, as it implemented policies decided by Moscow through the Government Order of the Hungarian People’s Republic. The situation of ceramics, where the will of the people is again accepted in magazines from 1956which again have a historical right to the freedom of autonomy. As happened in 1849, the dominant power, very superior, aplastó the movement. But again Hungary received privileges from those who were not counted in the rest of the cities of Telón de Acero.
In our time, Orbán has for years exploited this long history of foreign domination and brought it to the Hungarian government for his own benefit. The fruit of this was consolidation Visegrad Groupa bloc of countries formed by Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Poland, as a counterweight to the proposals of the media in Brussels, another type of “external interference” declared on more than one occasion by the former leader.
A group of influencers who were green countrymen who had lost heart in the EU, but who had previously been seriously disaffected Losing them integral to how to move forward after the Ukrainian war. Orbán’s stance in favor of the Russians was difficult to understand from Poland, a major ally of the Ukrainians in the conflict, as it created them all as part of the Maple Tree and had long suffered from Soviet repression.
En su trabajo Not all items must be used. Characteristics of Fidesz’s memory policyHistorian Simone Benazzo describes Orbán as an incalculable “warrior of memory” who has demonstrated a “clear understanding of national history” and a great ability to “legitimize himself with the herramienta of memory”. “By pointing out the conflicting actors, position yourself in your party as the main supporter of Hungary’s national sovereignty,” Benazzo argued.
However, it seems to have finally emerged in relation to Russia, the old dominant power, which, moreover, is currently showing a desire to expand its power of influence. a deadly coup against the image of Orbán as the guarantor of Hungarian independence.
It seems to ignore the words of the Hungarian with this desire to build a rural “naval vessel” that will stand out during the victory speech. No one should believe that this will mean a blind acceptance of what Brussels postulates. From there, everything points to an attack. This is necessary if the new president of the Hungarian government hopes to benefit from them 17,000 million euros frozen for the needs of the democratic media of Brussels.
And the point is that in many cases such pressures will appear, just like this aid package for Ukraine, which Orbán had blocked in the European Parliament. But while playing the first few steps, Magyar paid attention to his history lessons and worries about maintaining the advantage he had so well used over his predecessor.
No wonder what will be on your first visit abroad next May. His destiny will be none other than Poland, with its great alliance in the Visegrad blockade, a group of influence which, as we record, can help him face, connected with the case, the obligations imposed by Western Europe, so popular in the past. A visit to Brussels to unlock the European aid legacy will follow Warsaw. It is a matter of priority.
Leave a Reply