There are public decisions that are not just administrative. These are vision decisions.
Energy is, today, one of the biggest factors putting pressure on local public finances.
It is not an optional expense. It is structural, growing and, above all, volatile. For years, municipalities were limited to paying the bill. Today, the question is no longer that.
The question is: do we continue paying for energy or do we start managing it?
It is in this context that models based on local production, self-consumption and intelligent energy management emerge. Models that allow you to transform a passive expense into an active strategy.
In the specific case under analysis – in the Municipality of Barreiro, where I am Vice-President – the difference is clear: between a scenario that could represent around 9 million euros in energy costs and a solution of around 6.5 million euros, we are talking about significant potential savings, but above all about a paradigm shift.
Because the real theme is not just the price. It’s control.
Producing energy locally is, in itself, a relevant step. But it’s not enough. The real innovation lies in the ability to store energy — called “storage” — and use it when it is most needed and most expensive. And this is where the model gains intelligence.
This type of approach allows reducing exposure to volatility in energy markets, optimizing self-consumption, increasing the energy autonomy of territories and introducing predictability in public spending.
In other words: It’s not just efficiency. It’s strategy.
At an international level, this is the path followed by cities that want to lead the energy transition. The decentralization of production, combined with digital energy storage and management solutions, is at the heart of the most advanced public policies.
Portugal cannot be left behind. And municipalities cannot continue to be stuck in past models.
Naturally, decisions of this nature raise legal questions. It’s legit. It’s healthy. It is recommended. Scrutiny is part of democracy and good public management. But it is important not to miss the essential point: energy policy cannot be held hostage by administrative inertia.
There are times when governing means choosing: Choosing between paying more or paying better; between depending on the market or building autonomy; between managing the present or preparing the future.
The energy transition cannot be achieved with speeches. It’s made with decisions.
And postponing decisions is also a decision — but usually the most expensive of all.
Leave a Reply