WASHINGTON / LONDON (IT BOLTWISE) – The sudden appointment of Kyle Walsh as director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) is causing an uproar in the scientific community. Critics criticize the bypassing of the usual selection process and fear that NIH positions will become increasingly politicized.

Today’s daily deals at Amazon! ˗ˋˏ$ˎˊ˗

The recent appointment of Kyle Walsh as director of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) has caused considerable unrest in the scientific community. The decision, made without the usual selection process, is seen as politically motivated as Walsh has close ties to US Vice President JD Vance. This development raises questions about the future independence of the NIH institutes.

Typically, NIH institute directors are selected by a committee of leading scientists that includes both internal and external experts. This practice is intended to ensure that positions are filled with the most qualified candidates who have the necessary academic and administrative skills. Bypassing this process in favor of a political appointment could set a precedent that jeopardizes the scientific integrity of the NIH.

Kyle Walsh, a neuroepidemiologist and associate professor at Duke University, has scientific credentials, but critics like Jenna Norton, program director at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, say he is underqualified to lead an institute with a $900 million budget. The fact that Walsh has a personal connection to JD Vance increases concerns about political influence.

This appointment comes in a context where several NIH institutes are already without permanent directors. Concern is growing that the current government may seek to fill additional positions with politically acceptable people, which could jeopardize the independence of scientific research. The scientific community is watching developments like a hawk and is calling for transparency and a return to a meritocratic selection process.


*Order an Amazon credit card with no annual fee with a credit limit of 2,000 euros! a‿z

Bestseller No. 1 ᵃ⤻ᶻ “KI Gadgets”

Bestseller No. 2 ᵃ⤻ᶻ “KI Gadgets”

Bestseller No. 3 ᵃ⤻ᶻ “KI Gadgets”

Bestseller No. 4 ᵃ⤻ᶻ «KI Gadgets»

Bestseller No. 5 ᵃ⤻ᶻ “KI Gadgets”

Did you like the article or news - Political influences at the NIH: Controversy over new director appointment? Then subscribe to us on Insta: AI News, Tech Trends & Robotics - Instagram - Boltwise

Our KI morning newsletter “The KI News Espresso” with the best AI news of the last day free by email – without advertising: Register here for free!




Political influences at the NIH: Controversy over new director appointments
Political influences at the NIH: Controversy over new director appointment (Photo: DALL-E, IT BOLTWISE)

Please send any additions and information to the editorial team by email to de-info[at]it-boltwise.de. Since we cannot rule out AI hallucinations, which rarely occur with AI-generated news and content, we ask you to contact us via email and inform us in the event of false statements or misinformation. Please don’t forget to include the article headline in the email: “Political Influences at the NIH: Controversy Over New Director Appointment”.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *