Imagine that in a soccer match the first half is governed by one regulation and the second by another and to make matters worse, the referee in charge of interpreting and applying the rules was imposed by the owner of one of the teams.
More or less that was what happened with the Amparo Law and the issue of retroactivity.
Juggling legal affairs, Morena and its supporters approved the reforms to the Amparo Law that limit (although they say otherwise) this fundamental right of citizens to combat the excesses and illegalities committed by those in power.
What the deputies approved in the early morning and the senators approved in minutes was that the procedural stages of the appeal for protection that were presented with the law in force remain as they are.
But, for the next stages the new rules will be applied, the ones the president wanted Claudia Sheinbaum and most of them gave him as a gift.
For example, if a citizen filed a request for protection a month ago and the judge granted it provisionally pending the hearing to determine whether the protection is definitive, the provisional protection remains in force.
If, as expected and due to the rush brought about by the party in power, said reform is published tomorrow in the Official Gazette of the Federation, the hearing to determine whether the requested protection is definitively granted or not, will be governed by what the cherry congressmen approved yesterday.
What is the problem?
Well, the new rules severely condition the granting of protection, whether individually or collectively, forcing the plaintiff to demonstrate that the government’s decision really it harms him.
In addition, the judge will have to assess, with the new rules, whether the granting of protection to the plaintiff (individual or collective) It does not affect the social interest.
Social interest can be translated as the interest of the government, since the senators and deputies of Morena clearly stated that these modifications are to “prevent a few” from stopping the works “that benefit the people”, as was the case of the succession of injunctions against the destruction of the Mayan jungle for the construction of an inoperative train.
Likewise, the Morenistas’ justification for approving the reforms was to prevent “potentates” from using protection to make tax resolutions longer.
Citing Macuspana’s classic, which used biblical quotations at its convenience, the Morenistas will have to be reminded of the mandate of “not doing good things that seem bad, nor bad things that seem good.”
In the end, the only people harmed by these reforms will be the citizens.
All.
****
Now it turns out, according to the much troubled and criticized governor of Tabasco, Javier May, that the landlord’s scandal Ramiro López Obrador, “Pepín” is a “campaign of the right, of the conservatives” and not just another case of inexplicable enrichment of his Government Secretary.
Those statements repeated like the Ave Maria by the Morenistas whenever they are seen on display are nothing new.
As you know, López Obrador’s brother is in the news after he presented in his asset declaration the ownership of 13 ranches in various parts of Tabasco, eight of them purchased in the years in which his brother served in the National Palace.
But the governor prefers to turn the other way because he already has enough problems with the fact of having “windowed” Adam Augusto Lopez with the theme of sign of The Sweeper.
It’s not going to be that they pull your ears from La Chingadaagain.
@adriantrejo