Don’t forget that Holy Week must be macho

It is therefore necessary to cancel it at any moment and according to the magisterium Manuel Carmen with Cabalgata de los Reyes Magos, the Great Herman of the Mother State proposes to update the Easter processions to cleanse them of patriarchal connotations.

Finally, since the Jacobins invented secular bautizos, the revolutionary desire to establish a civil institution of the clergy has not ceased.

And this same impulse is tainted by me to reconfigure rituals and myths according to the dictates of natural reason Enjoy our days. The government decided to cancel the National Festival of Tourist Interest category in Holy Week, denying last Sunday the Cofradía de la Purísima Sangre to admit women as cofrades.

The progressive worship of the democratic fetish seems to rule only when the vote reflects an outcome that was deemed correct. ex ante. Since the government is “worthy to apply” in the courts against the decision taken by the mayor at the municipal assembly, it does not guarantee “effective equality of access and participation in entities open to the public as provided by law”.

Although these are private Catholic associations, the government understands that the exclusion of women from management is not supported by freedom of association.

Such gubernatorial interventions are a living testimony problems of the modern state tolerate forms of autonomous organization within a civil society that self-regulates on the edge of its coercive monopoly.

And it is that in the new millennium there is a social imperative of an inescapable form: complete and utter equality.

But like everything, it has to integrate zeitgeist turn If it is a commonly assumed axiom, the validity of which is not in question.

“I have the same right to participate in the trials as a man,” shout the women harmed by the repentant veto. is it true Is it in line with this canonical legislation?

This claim is based on no other basis than an uncritically considered mandate to feminize society. The only basis is the finding that women make up the majority of the population non sequitur Accordingly, it must be represented proportionally in all areas.

But why?

Since we have no discrimination against women under the law, they are left with only one reason Another baseless cliché: plurality necessarily enriches. A sophistry that, by abstracting the biological and temperamental differences between the sexes, prevents us from appreciating the ecological and anthropological sense of the segregation of spaces under a different prism than discrimination.

The argument expressed in the protests against Saguntine’s critics of the heart is always the same: an appeal to tradition is not a sufficient reason.

Just because something always happens a certain way, I argue, doesn’t mean you have to watch it that way. Because custom cannot be a limitation to the exclusion of women.

This rudimentary reasoning reveals the inability of contemporary (ideological and statist) thinking to understand traditional reason. The inheritance of mentality raíz illustrada, que deny the past as a source of authority.

However, if the attempt to apply rules of universal validity (in this case equal duty) fails to adequately capture the nature of cultural expressions, each of them has its own character and is an organic product of customs within the community.

Thus, when some centuries-old institutions resist attempts to rationally reorganize society in the name of general moral and intellectual ideals such as equality, an inclusive vision is revived.

The “gender perspective” that the feminist tingle wants to apply to all aspects of life is the view that every aspect of reality has its own style, its own regularity, its own peculiar tone.

Realize that each tradition corresponds to a local reason that cannot be overcome by any ideological trend or government regulation, it would be an authentic museum of respect for the unique diversity of this name.