The tragedy of October 29, 2024 (with hundreds of dead and mismanagement) calls for political responses. However, it is highly doubtful that criminal liability can arise.
A reasonable person might object to the removal of a political responsibility which, on the other hand, was largely paid for by resignation Carlos Mazon.
But another very different thing is to accept something uncritically judicial instruction on what weighs on the principle of suspicion of bias and the possible vices of nothingness that amenazan with the necessity of jumping through the air during the entire process.
The extensive revelation justified by the woman’s prosecution at the Tribunal Superior de Justice of the Community of Valencia, which is investigating Carlos Mazón, is completely out of date.
Because on the same day that public audio recordings appear that point to the fact that her husband, also a judge, was actively and disproportionately involved in outreach: interviewing victims, giving instructions to officials and following complaints from various families, including practicing solitary confinement.
If this is confirmed in the extreme, let’s not consider it a mere administrative irregularity, until frontal attack by a player next to the goalI convert the cases into one parallel instructorin very serious criminal proceedings.
It is difficult to imagine anything more fatal to the appearance of impartiality of the magistrate. It is even more difficult to imagine a more appropriate context for sending to the TSJCV a sensible exhibition which de factointends to armor the heart of the matter before deciding the complaint against her.
Suspected collisions are not the party’s invention. Over the months, the game launched an investigation clearly focused on the areawithout having full competence to attribute them.
He called to inform his cabinet jefe, his listeners, his chauffeur, his closest political core and quickly Alberto Núñez Feijóo within five hours.
Mazón himself states (with a procedural reason) that he investigated them as an accused, but without the guarantees of the accused and without the power to enforce the law.
In this context, the question is inevitable.
So increase your exposure right nowin a full week of new texts from the immediate vicinity of the ex-president, and without hope, would you ask your director of communications in your coverage, which he mentions in the next few days?
The chronology prompts the impression of a desperate movement towards the possible invalidity of the instruction.
But the shadows don’t fall into the shape. Alcanzan also on the bottom of the car.
The judiciary claims that Mazón committed “gross negligence” by failing to coordinate with the Valencian government compensation for the inaction of the Council for Justice and Emergency Situations, Salome Pradas.
But they do so on questionable legal grounds. The Valencian legislation attributes operational powers in the area of civil protection and warning to the population and the competent council, not to the presidency.
It is certain that the President can assume sole authority in the event of a catastrophic emergency. But the car does not end in a specific form starting at a precise moment and with this precise information, Mazón was bound by law to do so regardless of what specific decisions had to be made.
Now more. The mayor is responsible for supporting emergency directives to other councilors to answer to the president, who will not coordinate with the council… I accept that the powers at this stage had an emergency, not the presidency.
This shift between the recognition of the formal competence of the councilor and, conversely, the extension of criminal responsibility to the president without a clear definition of the guarantor’s responsibility is a slippage in criminal law.
This also helps the construction of the mentioned “interference” of Mazon in the Es-Alert controversy based on the reports of his cabinet chief, Jose Manuel Cuencaat Pradas.
That WhatsApp exists and is politically destroyed is indisputable.
If they are still directly criminally liable for withdrawing or modifying a serious warning when the report was written and technically ready, that is something that the car ultimately does not attach solidarity to, which requires a charge of involuntary manslaughter by omission.
None of this relieves Mazon of his own contradictionsseeking his longer absence in the most critical hours of the house. Don’t ask for evasive answers about what and what you’re looking for.
However, there is a gulf between political responsibility (undisputed) and criminal responsibility (much more difficult to sustain), and it is legitimate that a judge intends to explore this line.
But it is precisely for this reason, because what is at stake is so important, that the guidelines must be careful, transparent and legally sound.
hi no es Participation of husband-juez without competence, investigation de facto At one point outside TSJ, the widespread and unrefined use of the concept of omission and the suspicious timing between the scandal phase and the promotion of the dissected exposition become a very disturbing picture.
The Supreme Court will have the last word. Not only that there are indications for a criminal investigation of Carlos Mazón, if the case was not investigated with the minimum guarantees that are necessary in the country.
Leave a Reply