Immanuel Kant he introduced in philosophy a form of reading phenomena which he called transcendental, in the end it has nothing to do with the reception he later received in the castellan, where he came to denote something of a decommunal meaning.
Kant’s transcendental analysis consists primarily in the fact that he wonders not so much what things are about, but how.
Or, I say in the manner of the German thinker, his condition of possibility.
It can be good to base these metaphysical heights on character Vito Quiles Includes a redless triple somersault and the safety of a batacazo attachment.
But let me try.
What is the point of seeing the transcendental term in those who are in Congress or who look at politicians, that is, always asking them without question about the white elephant in the middle of the house, which the other comrades present do not go or do not want to see?
I remember the horror that struck me in my country of England and in the United States, the brashness and sometimes the venom with which journalists argued with politicians.
Here, on the contrary Apparently there are colleagues who come to see every day.
Therefore, some Spanish journalists usually have an attitude of complicity in servile cases, which seems to constantly express the favor they owe the politician for being willing to give them an interview.
Hey do this Peppa Bueno He only talks about one step with the Prime Minister.
But we try to avoid the juice of valor and “vayapordelantism” to analyze what Vito Quiles represents. And not only because it would be diametrically opposed to our proposed transcendental method, but above all because we would deviate from our main goal.
So let’s start with an observation that many people are interested in discussing: Vito Quiles is a journalist.
In the same form in which it could be done with much greater enforcement of the term machinery Silvia Intxaurrondo. Who flaunts the old man’s load Follonerowhose name as I used to be Cervantes there is no way to get along with your person’s homeland.
Starting from the premise to all irrefutable lights that Vito Quiles is a journalist, and without now addressing the question of whether or not he is a good professional, what is the reason that leads us to say that his character is revivable?
What we see from the general in this participant’s way of thinking is that he usually formulates the most unpleasant possible question to the politician of the moment at the least opportune moment.
For example, you can ask Patxi López for agreements with EH Bildu, when this word ultraderecha. Or you can send an explanation to Silvia Intxaurrondo about the astronomical contract we pay so generously among all Spaniards. ON Irene Montero always asks her about the topic that happens most often: feminism.
It is true that many times these public appearances by journalists seem like one too many performance of an artistic type that properly expresses periodic intervention.
But is there still any value in your actions?
In my opinion, I don’t just say that if, more precisely, They give them added effectiveness and meaning.
“Who are the journalists who do not have the slightest discomfort in systematically boycotting a comrade who only seeks to position a politician against their beliefs?”
In fact, one could decide that Vito Quiles is in the panorama of contemporary journalism and that the artist who elevates the superchería of art hasta sus límites, recognizing with posing part of the fraud that has come at the expense of many other highly regarded and supposedly respectable works in the art world.
As an example, we present a grotesque incident, such a definition of the degree of expertise in what our country has fallen into, Sarah Santaolallasomeone without preparation of any type. And who, as a result, has to return to the label in which they wrap all items to justify their presence in the media: the activist.
That’s why this lady filed a false assault complaint against Vito Quiles and that he establishment Disrupted by what should have enhanced success, it tells us nothing that we have not actually overcome: we are talking about agents intrinsically toxic to democracy.
Now, yes, let’s think about the reasons why these types of personalities seem to comment on political talk shows alongside periodical pundits.
¿No consequences a clear degradation of the profession Why don’t you care about the deadly effects that cause you to be in the social red?
It is true that one can argue against this that there is no singularity in the form of action of Vito Quiles. And of course nothing happening doesn’t mean you mentioned Follonera or reporters in other contexts Caiga quien caigaa program in which the same things always happen.
But there is something that has changed its essential form, and it is, as I say, context.
Wherever the desensitized journalists of the media press of the past asked questions with complete impunity and without any intervention from their comrades, we observed that when Vito Quiles formulates a request, he immediately asks spontaneous representatives of the world who, as if by magic trying to stop him from hurting himinterrupted the journalist and transformed himself, more or less willingly, into a mural to protect the politician.
“Vito Quiles, with his regular performances, focuses in one way on the ontological fear that freedom of expression arouses in our imaginations.”
And since that’s the most important thing that comes out of this character’s manifestation, you’d want it to be that extravagant.
Why are there journalists who have no problem systematically boycotting a comrade who only wants to oppose a politician against their beliefs?
Why should the council submit to demands that should be made outside of Congress?
Could it be that its form of implementation, on the contrary, emphasizes the professional invalidity and servility of people who only ask what politicians consider appropriate?
The last thing we know in this regard is that, at the request of the self-proclaimed Association of Parliamentary Journalists, “the congress is suspended for a moment to decide in Vito Quiles and Bertrand NdongoThis great museum of heroism.
Well, what conclusion can we draw from all this?
Well, that’s basically it Yes, Vito Quiles didn’t exist at the time, so I had to make him up.
It’s not like I’m saying that our music is nothing that can never be separated something that represented, at the very least, a critical view of the political reality of this country.
But shut up performance periodicals, on the one hand, focus on the ontological fear that freedom of expression arouses in our imagination.
And furthermore, as an important part of the national period, it has no problem putting itself in the service of political corruption and censorship.
Since the pandemic, we have examined how the most sinister tentacles of socialism in the world penetrate most of the communication media and use this dark insignia of pseudo-periodism, which is RTVE at this moment.
It is true that if Vito Quiles had been the whole season, he would have had to go to the chiringuito. But also that without it, much of true journalism could be given to what has not yet been given: weight.
That’s why they hate them so much.
*** Manuel Ruiz Zamora is a philosopher.
Leave a Reply