Because he was a Silicon Valley entrepreneur instead of a Prime Minister, Pedro Sánchez introduced the “odiometer”. Así como se lee.
It is a medicine to meditate on the consequences of polarization in social circles called HODIO. A name that sounds like a meditation app, like a device that captivates you in the government’s moral ITV.
Odio, but with an “h” because Huella del Odio y la Polarización. Like coal, but to let you know you’re remembering your neighbor’s mother in this Instagram story that only your five best friends will see.
“Social leaders will tend to make things public,” said the prime minister, who sends messages and speaks in interventions with journalists and without the possibility of questions, who did not explain today the terms of his agreement with Eh Bildu, how the decisions were made during the pandemic or what went through with the apagon.
Using terms like “algorithmic amplification” and inspirational phrases like “hate is created, it’s not congruent with a human being,” Pedro Sánchez described himself as a human resources director and delivered a basic course on inclusive diversity management in the workplace.
PowerPoint slide only, electronic coffee breaks and an anonymous form for rating the emotional climate of a national race.
Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez intervenes to launch the first international campaign against hate.
Eph
I have so many questions that I ask myself without air. Where do we go from here to start meditating on hate? For the Opinion section of this periodical, for example?
With the goodness that my companions come to me and I go looking for them. Do not forget that we are ready to write columns with moral decibels next to the text.
The same Sánchez said that “hate is usually male”. What impact does the discussion have on the dehumanization of men? Five points less to get it.
Now let’s go to point X of our most wanted Oscar Puente?
I would like to know that this point on the hate scale is as joyful as this direction Feijoo: “Where are you going to Caesar when you were unable to Caesar who returned to Ventorro while 229 people were killed, miserable?”.
If the scale is not pointing high, the instrument needs to be recalibrated.
However, I do remember the week I missed the case Paco SalazarThe Ministerio de Igualdad issued an informal warning about the popularity of the term “Charo” in social circles, condemning the promotion of the term as a weapon of misogyny.
And I am very afraid that this new investigation of the Sanchist Minister of Truth will take place.
First, if you hate it. Luego if it ranks.
Y, it is finally confirmed that you can speak and this requires civic re-education.
In line with the progressive creed that relied on existential vacio in data and statistics, the Prime Minister therefore assured us that the possibility of hate speech could be “systematically meditated upon”.
Mr. President, allow me to wonder that anyone is unable to meet the demands before us or maintain the railway lines in decent condition learn to meditate systematically.
Quien many ships, few open.
A Centrian who fought in World War III learned the key to talking about the ecology of hate.
And once again I explain that in my ignorance the word “systematic” does not give me any information.
Óscar Puente, María Jesús Montero and Félix Bolaños at the congress last February 12.
For example, if I ask myself: if the worst result in your history in local elections is in your party, is it because of hate speech or voters who also have a bad opinion?
For more peace of mind, Sánchez ensured that the proceedings would be transparent and strict, with experts available to the Spanish Observatory on Racism and Xenophobia.
Less bad.
Without an observatory and a commission of mediocre experts, how can we maintain absolute certainty that this is the only other chiringuito?
The goal, he says, is to know who is responsible. Acabaramos. It turns out that this is all because of what I always do: tell the dissident of the game that the rules are the ones I “love”.
The President leads a progressive but safe strategy of identifying the PSOE with her person, the country with her person, political stability with her person, democracy with her person.
Business fusion between party, government, state and personal biography.
The obsession with consensus and polarization is just a curtain of humor to summon “hate” for anything inconvenient to power.
Because actually this trick is old. If everything is hate, nothing is criticism. If politics turns into a laboratory of government-designed moral metrics, a dissident is not a citizen: This is the problematic data item in the excel spreadsheet.
Small stat bug that should be fixed.
And no one will clearly face what the data says.
For this reason, it is worth noting that the government officials who use the language usually understand it as trying to regulate it.
At first they will tell you that they just want to observe.
That’s all you want to prevent.
And finally, who just wants to protect you from me.
All very pedagogical, very therapeutic and above all very Orwellian.
Leave a Reply