The PP’s decision to assert a position within the National Security Committee to analyze the consequences of the extraordinary regularization of immigrants means a qualitative leap in the debate.
This is no longer a political conflict between the government and the opposition, until it is found that the process launched by La Moncloa crossed the red line: it turned out to be only for an administrative purpose. become a potential national security issue.
A new position presided over by popular vote Educate Uriarte and with the mayor of PP and your thanks through a thoughtful vote, you will be able to bring documentation of administrations, request information and call to compare other costs, officials and experts.
Your work will coincide with the cycle of regularization applications scheduled for April to June, which guarantees that the House examination will take place at the same time as the Home Office through hundreds of thousands of despatch papers.
The starting point is not irrelevant. The Centro Nacional de Inmigración y Fronteras de la Policía Nacional produced a risk analysis that puts the number of possible legalization beneficiaries at 1.3 million cases, far more than the half million estimated by the government.
The latest annual national security report corresponding to 2024 warns that the sources of illegal immigration can coexist with the financing of other criminal activity and be used by third states as an institutional herramienta de geopolitical presión or desestabilización.
Ignoring these signals is not wise; es desentenderse de los correct diagnostics del Estado.
At the same time, the European table has moved in a direction that is contrary to what it proposes Pedro Sánchez.
The European Union has stabilized its migration policy, strengthening border control mechanisms, return centers and decentralization, and reducing the possibility of mandatory relocations.
Germany, a former symbol of unlimited care, has agreed with the new Damascus government on a path to repatriate within three years up to 80% of Syrians who reside on its territory and work for those who need a residence permit or have committed a crime.
As the heart of Europe turns towards an orderly return, Pedro Sánchez is about to start a massive regularization of a precarious situation.
In this context, a clear warning from the European Commissioner for Migration is included, Magnus Brunner. In a recent statement, Brunner noted that the residence permit granted by Spain “is not a blank check” in the Schengen area and that regular immigrants who intend to settle in other countries could be returned to Spanish territory.
The message is clear: Spain is ultimately responsible for the process and the resolution of its controls, not any European partners, who said it was clear that We are not willing to accept the effects of our unilateral decisions.
It is worth saying: this is not about denying the reality of the hundreds of thousands of people who live and work in a submerged economy, nor about turning a blind eye to their living conditions. Any serious condition requires regularization mechanisms, precisely to promote integration and reduce the space for work and crime.
But regularization is more than just a humanitarian gesture. It is a gigantic legal and administrative operation requirements given by fairy tales, clear criteria and strict controls.
The government decided to transport without an embargo. It enforced regularization by decree, without a transparent evaluation of the impacts on health, education, housing or social services, and resisted strengthening the basic guarantees claimed by PP and other actors.
The requirement to require official confirmation of criminal antecedents from countries of origin, replaced by mere declarations of responsibility, is a worrying symptom of freedom in an area where bona fide transfer must be accompanied by a duty of verification.
Nadie discusses that the vast majority of potential beneficiaries are peaceful people. But that’s precisely why it’s irresponsible not to do everything we can to expose the minority that isn’t.
That the Congress and the Senate, voiced by the PP, Vox and other groups, have asked for a slowdown or a thorough review of regularization should lead the government to correct, not anchor.
It should also cause growing concern in Brussels, where they fear that a measure of this magnitude, taken “absolutely and by decree”, will also cause further tension in the Schengen area.
Executive response, hasta ahora, ha sido decalcify the dissident person and minimize technical warnings.
EL ESPAÑOL does not pretend to feed ghosts or demonize immigration. But it is also possible to look at what happens on the other side before regularization, which the national security apparatus sees as potentially destabilizing if managed consistently.
There is wide ground between alarmism and ingenuity: serious policies, evaluated and compatible with our European compromises.
Leave a Reply