Recognizing the proportions designed by the Roman architect Vitruvius, Leonardo da Vinci I discussed the human body in a square and a circle.
The square represented the earth, and the human figure with horizontal arms and jointed legs fit perfectly into it.
The circle symbolized the perfection of the heavenly: with duty in the middle, open piers and raised arms defined the circumference.
Leonardo wanted to symbolize that the human body is a bridge between the earthly world and the divine world, and therefore we feel aesthetic pleasure when we think of a person equipped with the appropriate proportions.
Now let’s go, let’s go, and Sydney Sweeneywith its squares and circles, in Leonardo’s scheme.
Because they are attractive, because they symbolize the connection between the earthly and the heavenly.
Unfortunately yes, I wonder at the universal harmony and music of the spheres.
But I’m afraid the truth is more absurd. More interesting.
I imagine two primates who have lived here for a thousand years, in which genetic mutations have created two different desires: first, men who have reached the end are sexually attractive, and second, godless men who are modestly committed.
None of them have ever heard of Vitruvius, nor are they particularly sophisticated; Simply put, your sex drive is activated by various interrupters.
The point is that the characteristic “pechos hacia arriba” is related to fertility and “pechos hacia abajo” is not. Primate A thus has many more options in achieving copulation with the shadow of his preference, resulting in shame and offspring inheriting the same mania.
For a mere mathematical question, primate insanity began to impose itself across the generations swimming pool human genetics.
For this reason, men today are equipped with this erotic interrupter, that the good de Sweeney activates with such elegance.
And it is because we believe we are more rational than we are, but what is certain is that evolution has gifted us with a mountain of delusions like this, that we limit ourselves to romanticizing.
The scientific discipline he studies is evolutionary psychology and in it Robert Trivers was a god
‘La Insensatez de los Necios, La Logica del Engaño y el Autoengaño en la Vida Humana’.
As a diplomat, he studied psychology and became a doctor of biology at Harvard. Ideologically it was a disaster: when one read Necios necessity: the logic of engagement and self-involvement in human life Please keep your political comments modestly aside.
He was a close friend Huey P. Newtonthe founder of the black panteras who took on one of the boys i was with jamaican women may have lived part of his life.
This is the concept of “reciprocal altruism”, which attempts to explain how it is possible to develop it when it is much more expensive than selfishness: the evolutionary mathematical concepts that appeared in our erotic preferences had to eliminate self-sacrifice.
We also explained our tendency to self-involvement, which subsequently It makes it easier for others to get involved better.
Thus Trivers and evolutionary psychology now offer us a sharp machete with which to enter human nature.
Unfortunately, the demise of this science coincided with the revival of coolness woke upwho attributes all phenomena that contradict him to the action of mysterious power structures.
When a girl comes up with a bullet instead of a disintegrating gun, she explains it as the pernicious influence of patriarchy. Evolutionary psychology has its own explanation, but it is aquejados by being the authentic negatives of science.
Arguably, Trivers’ most interesting contribution is the theory of “parental inversion”, according to which it is most selective to find out the gender of the most effort in an offspring, and less inverted sexual partners do it together for the favor of former sexual partners.
Piensen en los people.
While a man only needs one short syncopal movement to fertilize an egg, a woman has to raise new moons within herself and feed and then love and care for the offspring for an unlimited period of time.
As long as the female’s body is occupied, the male can (theoretically) continue to hold the eggs to fertilize more eggs.
For our ancestors to make good choices, we could assume the difference between life and death. Those who are versatile (such as those with rich achievements, high status in the tribe, athletic abilities to compete and provide protection) have a better chance of surviving and joining the family.
Over the generations, a full skill has developed to evaluate and reason about a number of relevant properties through fairy pointers.
This is why today’s women are more selective than men. And so they work harder to achieve victory and status to attract them.
Go ahead and explain that to a mainstream feminist and see how it turns out.
Leave a Reply