News about it María Soledad Iparraguirrealias Anbotwill start to enjoy a regime of semi-freedom this month, it has caused reasonable emotions among the victims of terrorism and deep indignation in Spanish public opinion.
No es para menos. She is one of the bloodiest leaders in ETA’s history, responsible for organizing dozens of assassinations and managing the gang’s finances.
On a day-to-day basis in Zaballa prison, it is not an act of justice until the result of a calculated strategy. The movement, which legal experts and prominent victims’ groups have condemned, is based on the fraudulent use of prison legislation.
Because it does not consist in the automatic application of the law, but in a legal approach that is supposed to solve the strictest checks of the system.
This architecture of partial impunity is supported by four fundamental pillars.
First, abuse of Article 100(2) of the Penal Code. The government has used this flexibility mechanism to give third-tier benefits to those who are only technically eligible in the second place, thereby avoiding the arrest requirements imposed by the law.
Furthermore, the reform of Act 7/2014. A technical adjustment that makes it possible to spend years in prison in France and thus artificially accelerates the liquidation of sentences in Spain.
Third, the transfer of prison jurisdiction to Vasco’s government, allowing for a lax interpretation of reintegration, was more concerned with political convenience than the severity of punishment.
And finally prescribing causes. Recent case archive Miguel Angel Blanco by prescription, he removed the last day Iparraguirre was held in preventive detention.
The clearest sign that we are in for a complicated process is in the case Anbot There is no minimal fear. Exjefa ETA has not asked for a sincere apology or cooperated with justice to clarify the 400 cases of gang crimes that occurred without a known author.
Without these requirements, any medicine is semi-freedom a simulacrum that diverts the last end of the sentence.
This relationship of the prison regime, which incites the government in sequential legal engineering, has a clear political motivation: the “presos per presupuestos” pact between PSOE and EH Bildu.
Unfortunately for me Pedro Sánchezhis own Arnaldo Otegi it was clear that the stability of the legislature and the support of the decision of the state were associated with the “coming home” of prisoners and prisoners.
Salida of Anbot can therefore only be understood as a letru of exchange cobrada on the altar of the president’s government.
It is certain that Spain presents a unique situation in the treatment of multiple animals.
While other countries apply the mathematical accumulation of sentences, our system introduced permanent reviewable prison (PPR) late.
This punishment, which prevents the validity of imprisonment without strict judicial review, is the bluntest herramient of our order against the most dangerous criminals.
The problem is that PPR does not apply to tractors due to the prohibition of retroactivity, since these crimes precede the approval of the law that introduced it.
One way to address this lack of fairness is to extend the scope of the PPR, as proposed by the opposition to only one day in Congress, and make it extendable to hidden objects on the side of the corpse or to ordinary accidents.
But the transition of the PSOE and its members to this reform to the bloc confirms it You don’t want to hide the sadness of those escaping terrorists.
Regardless of the technical debates that may end the criminal treatment of ETA asesinos, the ethical aspect of the problem is indisputable.
And it can only be considered a shame that the PSOE government has prioritized preserving the power of memorializing the victims.
Facilitating the semi-freedom of ruthless criminals with regulatory fees designed to bring the state of derecho to an immoral parliamentary arithmetic that, while granting partial impunity to terrorists, exceeds the dignity of their victims.
Leave a Reply