Trump, like a good emperor, ate them up for sobriety

From an eschatological understanding of universal history there is little doubt as to which Donald Trump He is a providential ruler for the United States.

Endowed with the intuitive genius of great men, the charismatic plutocrat burst forth like a storm to warn the plebs against the oligarchy of the transitional regime, neutered by the deindustrialization of redundant globalization and the necrophilic and masochistic ideology of turboprogressivism.

Despite the implementation of America’s new “golden day” propaganda, it is undeniable that At least for the first time, Trump has injected vigor into the decadent civilization of the United States. And he, forcing the conspiracy of the whole world against him, established a new order.

Because Trump understands himself only as the (re)incarnation of a recurring character: a king who, driven by an indomitable will that defies any convention, needs to create his own rules, thereby straining the constitutions of the republic that spawned him.

And it is precisely that history that does not progress linearly in circles that unfolds through the anticipation of events that will unfold in the future: insights and great figures foreshadow those who will implement them (verbigracy, Alexander the Great was a “type”, y Julio Cesar“antitype”).

Like Trump, Napoleon suffered one of his most humiliating defeats in the presence of cones.

And just as Trump shared the honey of triumph with his predecessors, he must also have attended the eclipse of his starthe same tragic fate that is reserved for all Promethean uprisings in the constant struggle against the obstacles that reality faces.

Just as Trump’s visionary generation (where the decline of the faculties runs parallel to the empire he rules) freed itself from decay: the imaginative vision then degenerated (into “locura,” according to the most critical).

Blind and deaf, Trump appeared before his court’s wishes regarding the impossibility of winning Iran in an all-out war. And after such a long drawn-out struggle, a regrettable victory that can engulf the US allows you to view the failed Iranian incursion as Trump’s worst mistake.

Oh, better said, el Croesus Trump’s mistake, perhaps the president imitated the arrogance of the last king of Lydia, who he also misinterpreted the oracles when he tried to conquer Persia: he prophesied to her that the crossing of the river would “destroy a great empire,” but he believed himself lost when it came to the realization of his own.

The inexorable resistance of the produced Oriental satrapy, in which it was accustomed to depose mandates when the figures of ajedreza were treated, sublimated impotence in a bleak and apocalyptic verbal escalation.

After that, the power that controlled the laudable gendarme of the free world emerged as an unfathomable and willful villain who cast hideous spells of bitterness.

America has come to be seen as the actor who guarantees order to the main promoter of chaos, will cause likely irreparable damage to reputation and la auctoritas after which he tried out for the role of director of the world order.

And yet this war had another unpredictable effect, which was even more transcendental: an operation that could have been aimed at conquering the supremacy of an anti-Western country had not yet taken place in China, which paradoxically benefited the main rival of the EEUU.

After undermining the international political and economic architecture that supported American hegemony, Trump could hasten the exact opposite of what he was trying to do with his Iran gloss: the end of the American empire and the definitive espaldarazo at the beginning of Siglo chino.

And so it is that as long as one tries not to forget the lessons of history, their subterfuges are animated by an irrepressible repetitive impulse that leads them to repeat the same mistakes.

Yes, Trump practiced it imitation of a hero of his predecessors he did so with all the consequences, and also reproduced the desliz which brought him to the caída: hubris. Belief in one thing, which is the generating principle of greatness, it leads to the path of the senseless when it brings about the demise of sobriety.

Trump, raised on his prowess in Venezuela, maddened by omnipotence (tends to compare himself to Christ in the past Jueves Santo), you may not be aware of the ecstasy of the “epic fury” of one who always seems destined to roll an enteras, making it necessary to seek out opponents more often.

Y de ahí se llega, naturalmente, a ese momento de divergencia entre las ambiciones del emperador y los intereses de la nación, que tan magistralmente desentrañó Stefan Zweig a propósito de Napoleón.

Después de haber sometido uno a uno a todos sus enemigos,

“el país [Francia] quiere war once, while Napoleón quiere without cesar war. You do not think of the community, but only of the world, of immortality. Human thinking has lost a lot of meaning, how could it be done otherwise, after such an improbable knowledge! With achievements we grow towards our goals; with victorias, on osadía; with triumphs over fate, a desire to claim it with increasing audacity”.

Like all emperors who had previously felt compelled to rise up as exterminating angels in open defiance of God, Trump was frustrated by the only will superior to his: the one true Lord of Hosts.

And with this endiosamient he provoked a greater return to this exciting revival of history in which we live: the secular friction between the Empire and the Pope.



Source

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*