“Fight the good fight every moment, every minute, every day.” Rick Emmett.
How comfortable it is to say “No to war” when your elders are Portugal and France, and not a country that raises the “aniquilación” of your nation as “politics, not a slogan” in its state policy and “death in America”, Señor Sánchez. It’s easy to be an activist when you protect, fund, and support the United States, NATO, the EU, and Israel.
It is politically beneficial to talk about peace and neutrality when their people always follow political actions that perpetuate communist and terrorist dictates. And why is it easy to invoke international law and the UN Charter while looking for measures on the other side against systemic violations by part of the Iranian regime.
Sánchez is not an example of neutrality and pacifism; It is the archetype of political marketing. There is nothing more convenient – or more hypocritical – than Sanchism’s foreign policy: consistently soft on communist and terrorist dictates and very “hard” on democracy.
Based on this “neutralidad”, diplomatic action is always inclined to make it easier for dictatorships that suit it to stay in power. Hypocrisy and many words “No to war”.
The Spanish government funded the Cuban dictatorship’s judicial body responsible for punishing dissidents with “collaboration” money, agreed with the Iranian regime on measures to resolve United States sanctions, sent millions of euros to Iran in “dual use” material (civilian and military), while The regime had tens of thousands of citizens at the protests.
He further transferred tens of thousands to Hamas and Hezbollah on charges of a “humanitarian aid” which can be done without the slightest control. The government’s external activities are always friendly with Iran, Hezbollah, Hamas or the Houthis and confrontational and hostile with the United States and Israel. Here’s to congratulations.
The problem with Sánchez’s intransigence is the crisis measures decree, in which more than half of the provisions have nothing to do with helping families and businesses. It created a mechanism to skip the assumption and clear the gas without parliamentary control, to intervene in the electricity market, to amortize the companies, to facilitate the okupación and to accelerate the shutdown of the nuclear plant.
This decree is nothing but humor, propaganda and other excuses to increase the economic power of the government by overcoming democratic limits and checks. The same thing that happened during Covid-19.
The anti-crisis package for the war in Iran aims to use the “omnibus decree” mechanism to introduce measures that have previously been attempted and which respond to the ideological agenda of the government and its members, not the specific shock of the war. It is a decree that erodes legal certainty and hides marketing and hypocrisy.
Sánchez presents himself as a defender of Ukraine while at the same time maintaining the annexation of used gas
Moncloa introduced him as “the shield mayor of all Europe”. In fact, this is another anti-democratic state, comparable to its negligence during Covid-19 and DANA.
Illustrate in life the measures that facilitate employment and interventionism: the freezing of birds during two years, the mandatory contractual procedures and the limitation of deshucios, which were tried to be introduced in the previous summary decree of the “social shield” included in February by the PP, Vox and Junts.
Sánchez is using the war to re-introduce a policy package of structural, interventionist and anti-market life that had already been introduced in a different parliamentary context. Furthermore, the expansion of the provisions on labor protection, the prevention of the ban on the courts of basic ministers and other measures required by the previous summary.
Sánchez has the same right to lose his vote. When the foot, he repackages permanent and deeply interventionist ideas in the framework of an “urgent” response to war, which step by step disables debate and creates the perfect battle: he accuses the opposition of being against aid.
The effect of this omnibus proposal is that it forces Congress to vote en bloc on very different and even conflicting elements. If the parliamentary group wants rebajas for gasoline, but rechaza the architecture of the policies that facilitate the occupation that has been introduced.
Furthermore, Sánchez’s propaganda accuses them of being antisocial and refusing to help citizens. It is deeply immoral.
Sánchez is using the war to re-introduce a policy package of structural, interventionist and anti-market life that had already been introduced in another parliamentary context
Sánchez uses the war as a coercion to re-introduce ideological measures over life, subsidies, the electricity market and interference in commercial activity that have been discussed and demanded.
At the same time, it increases executive discretion through actual regulation, thereby avoiding routine mediation and detailed debate about each mediation.
Previous decree of forgery “social shield” It included measures in favor of employment, an anti-hospital moratorium and a ban on water and electricity for vulnerable people.
Much of this content is now “copied and copied” in the Iran anti-crisis package, allowing the government to present the negative decree as a “no” to protection in the face of war instead of a lack of security over the actual content of the measure.
The consequences of this strategy of propaganda, political tactics and hypocrisy they go much further than the other omnibus decree which does not help and only extropea.
Spain tied to the Iran war with an optically comfortable energy position, but extremely vulnerable to a diplomatic crisis with the United States.
The United States has consolidated as the second supplier of gas with an increase of 30% and is also the first supplier of oil with around 15% of oil imports.
The irresponsible attitude of the government seeking a diplomatic role with Washington, It is a direct issue of energy security, inflation that is higher than the Eurozone average and the impact on GDP per capita.
The Bank of Spain raised its inflation forecast to 3% for 2026, but warned it could rise to 5.9% if the war widens. Moreover, rebaja la
growth forecast at 2.3% this year and 1.7% next year, down three tenths, but if the war continues, watch out for what could happen there
1.9% this year and 1.1% next year.
Considering that 80% of our primary energy needs are imported, according to MITECO, and that Eurostat has confirmed that between 2018 and 2025 Spain’s purchasing power adjusted GDP per capita has stagnated and is not approaching the European Union average, the poverty of our economy is evident.
A serious probe with the United States is setting a close eye on the third of natural gas currently connected to Spain’s regasification plants, just as capacity in Qatar and the United Arab Emirates has seen significant damage.
It will be forced to compete with China and Japan at much higher prices for flexible payments in the global market.
Some of that 30% of gas that is missing or disappearing, Spain will tend to cover the gas with “spot” LNG, which is three times more expensive and much more volatile, just as Iranian attacks on major producers in the Persian Gulf raise international competition.
Private companies from the United States can sell gas in any market at high prices and do not need the Spanish market for anything.
They don’t have to follow the Trump administration’s recommendations, but because they have all the alternatives that are most valuable to them, they don’t have to worry about securing Spain’s power.
Government propagandists claim that the United States is “spiking” the diplomatic conflict because it has a trade advantage with Spain. It’s such a myopic vision it’s embarrassing.
Even more ridiculous is the claim that renewables need to be protected when Spain imports more than 70% of its primary energy. They only look at the high cost of electricity, which is a small part of the country’s total energy costs.
Replacing the excess 15% of raw food supplied by the United States will increase the energy bill, the cost of refining and, in the medium term, gasoline and diesel. The impact would be direct and negative on employers of exporting, energy-intensive, transport and logistics companies.
I was worried in terms of tax and anti-business policies who left our societies in an extremely vulnerable situation.
Nadie escapes the fact that Sánchez’s policy—courtesy of Iran goes beyond not mentioning his authority when he “complains” about attacks on Gulf countries— Don’t move to Spain to a loyal member of the Arab League.
Sánchez is taking action on the economy and energy, knowing that businesses and families pay the bill. In a position equidistant between the Arab and Iranian leagues, it is possible to replace cheap and contracted gas with much more expensive costs and even face government lawsuits, as the world’s major operators warn. The result is higher average gas and oil costs with an immediate impact on the competitiveness of the industry.
The paradox is that Sánchez knows that if relations with Washington are strained, the easy way forward is to open the door to Russia at the very moment the European Union wants to close it.
Spain was the fifth largest buyer of LNG use in 2025, continuing to contribute more than 10% of the total and in some months exceeding 20%. More hypocrisy: Sánchez presents himself as a defender of Ukraine while maintaining the annexation of used gas, which sends hundreds of thousands of euros into the Kremlin machine.
Sánchez is very hard on President Trump but soft on Putin. Following the Energía and Aire Limpio Research Center (CREA), Spain paid €1,000 million for gas used in 2025, and between March 2022 and September 2025, it transferred €10,000 million in gas to Russia.
Isn’t it at least strange that Sánchez’s “neutrality” and “pacifism” always end up benefiting Russia, China, the Iranian regime and its ideological partners?
Sánchez’s false neutrality is just a marketing strategy to absorb the votes of the ultrazquierda and win the applause of the izquierda around the world. Citizens and businesses pay the real costs. Even if it’s so good, it’s fine.
Leave a Reply