Two Frenchmen and two French Dereches

“La” izquierda does not exist.

“La” izquierda means nada.

There is only one woman, not even two, and not only are they irreconcilable, but they are not homonymous [NDR: en el sentido aristotélico del término: según Aristóteles, las cosas ‘homónimas’ son aquellas que comparten el nombre, pero que aluden a realidades completamente distintas].

There is no great family of women who are on the progressive, humanistic, open side of dems and on the dark side, preachers of hate, friends of resentment, potentially criminal.

The only way to get the first triumph is to clearly and definitively release the second.

This is basically what happens in municipal elections.

Of course there are exceptions.

It was Roubaix where one of my fellow citizens of La Francia Insumisa, clearly anti-Semitic, became a fan of all forms.

And this recomposition does not occur without fluctuations, small and large cowardice, restraint.

But at the same time, voters are nostalgic Jean Jaurès y Leon Blum they had the sense to repudiate those of their chiefs who preached an alliance of shame with the LFI.

And for “pueblo de izquierda”, it’s good news that you didn’t know what pueblo meant when you repeated it.

A gathering of over-the-top citizens, in a way samples y el populus de los Antiguos?

¿O multitud devorada, like el deafness Atenas or the crowd of Rome, because of the demagoguery of the low era of nihilism?

The clarification is well done.

***

On the other hand, the principle sentence is the same.

“That” right does not exist.

There are two irreconcilable dereches, homónimas.

And between the heirs of the general, on the one hand, there is nothing in common (except for the name, about which they are also doomed to dispute). De Gaullede Valery Giscard d’Estaing or de Jacques Chiracand on the other hand, the announcers of the national agrupación, which feeds on sad passions, in the face of anger and racism.

Some understood it: they were at the ballot box and resolved history with history, values ​​with values, or at least sensitivities with sensitivities (voters recognized this and voted for them).

Others hesitated, marveling that they were there, and thought, as in Paris, that they might develop (but without trying to consume it all) a “connection of the right” against nature.

And they paid dearly for it.

Others, like in Nice, hiccuped the same calculation and unfortunately ganaron.

But these local victorias are engañosa victorias.

And the national lesson is ultimately the same overall.

This “connection of rights” is neither a line nor a strategy.

It is another ally of embarrassment.

And it’s generally a steep street for authentic Republicans.

Not if it can be inherited Benjamin Constantde Alexis de Tocqueville and once more from the general De Gaulleand to meet people who do not know everything about the former and whose predecessors wanted to know about the latter.

The GOP is trying to figure this out: and that’s the other good news of this election.

***

This is the “central block” which, for its part, suffers from another disease: the rivalry of egos, maraña ambition, and therefore the war of the jefes.

I don’t know what is most incurable: if the ideological confusion that spreads the points of reference blurs the lines of force and makes values ​​and projects indistinguishable. Or a narcissistic fool, arroganceof which the Ancients say that they blind men, and that when no substance opposes them, when they live only by mimicry and close rivalry, when Horses desafía a Demosthenesor Caesar on Pompeyit is a republic that is running to ruin.

I asked the children for a year Emmanuel Macron get through this.

A year to understand that what is at stake is not on a personal level, but rather the same bond that French society has and supports its institutions.

And a year also, among other things, to note that the balance of macronism does not depend on the circumstances and processes that undermine its rivalry. And that in a political setup like any other, history is never rewritten without consequences (especially when one or the other was the creator of what they are trying to undo).

Please note that this third volume of conciencia is in production from now on.

Indeed, the extremes will be returned to their true place, stripped of the fuel offered by voter desperation in the face of a devastated political landscape.

And so the upcoming presidential campaign will be at the height of a defining moment for the return of wars, the desperation of empires and the uncertain inclination of the West.