Trumpet output of three ministers this Tuesday against Juan Carlos Peinado to confirm that the government is fully committed to trying to release him Begoña Gómez judicial commissioner, who would find the coup against the image of the president very harsh.
What must be dealt with in the courts in a democracy has been translated from the will of the executive through the procedural power dictated this month by the executive’s judicial instructor. The case of Begoñoand field battle against judicial independence.
The Magistrate who concluded the instruction proposed that the President be tried at common law for four offences: influencing human trafficking, corporate corruption, misappropriation and embezzlement.
And shortly after getting acquainted with the resolution, the Minister of Justice opened fire and confirmed that the implementation of the law will be “heat and pain” for citizens.
Other Felix BolañosThe instruction constitutes “political persecution” that has no legal basis when Peinado’s decision is based on a list of three targets that are presented to President Sánchez at the center of a private enforcement operation.
Among all the Sánchez ministers who have stirred up controversy, The attitude of the Minister of Justice is particularly embarrassingwho, according to the official report, wants to act as abogado defender of the president’s family.
Never in a democracy has the person responsible for guaranteeing the integrity of the judiciary had to use his cargo to join the instructor like this, while also asking the president of the General Council for the Judiciary to approve Peinado for his car language.
These critics react to a calculated strategy of participation, with the ultimate goal of having a provincial audience in Madrid, which the government relied on as an angel of salvation to conclude the plan to Peinado.
The executive has the right to appeal to a higher court to try to dismiss the case, annul the juicio judicata and dismiss the popular accusation. However, it is not legitimate to attempt to point the way to the desired options in order to make a decision favorable to the investigation.
Naturally, all judicial decisions are subject to reasonable and reasonable criticism.
And it is the case that Juez Peinado was not conducted as the most scrupulous lawyer in some phases of this instruction.
He identified factual errors in the citations, preserved the questionable vagueness in the subject matter of the trial, and published forms in the chronology of his decisions.
This is the “heat” that feeds the government to feed it.
But it is one thing to draw attention to technical errors, and with even greater audacity to discredit the judicial power of political and unfounded plans, and that only because its decisions contradict the interests of the prime minister.
It suggests cruel recklessness that the executive branch has given up on an offensive that not only undermines the proper separation of powers, but also irresponsibly damages citizens’ credit in the judicial system.
As it could not be otherwise, this Tuesday, on the occasion of the declaration of Bolaños, the CGPJ issued a communique in which it formally demanded institutional loyalty from the government, which respects the competence of each power, as is done in any state of law.
The governing body of the games (which had implicitly indicated that it was going to approve Peinado) noted that it did not approve juez because of the content of its resolutions or its literary style. And that the court to fight a car that is considered unfair is not a disciplinary purpose, but rather a repetition before the superior courts.
To consider this warning, the government, lejos deponer su animosidad, has redoblado sus ataques.
On the way to press after the last Council of Ministers, three colleagues (Félix Bolaños, Elma Saiz y Oscar Puente) turned to whitewash the judge’s “ideological” actions by rebuking each of the most desaphoric, leading them to decide what happens when Peinado tries to “rape the political actions of democratically elected persons”.
Speaking about the prosecution of his case in China, Pedro Sánchez claimed that “justice has justice”.
However, if the president were in accordance with his requirement to observe the separation of powers, he would immediately fire three ministers who, from the table of Moncloa, devoted themselves to the promotion of justice for their cause.
Leave a Reply