Are you sure about what you think? Will it save immigration to Spain?

One day I had a problem with a politician who asked me about immigration. I wonder what’s cooking in the streets.

And I thought to myself “one day I will buy something by the meter and see it in passenger cars”.

The meter is better than any other meter. In the probes, a person says what they believe they need to decide so that a bad person does not pass in front of the viewer. But in the metro, the dears say everything.

Nadie miente cuando calla.

***

I was not surprised that this politician specifically called for immigration.

Politicians hold data and probes. But they did not know the reality.

For example. “El PIB de España sube” is a matter of course. Nadia can deny it.

And then he brings in an adviser or a cabinet jefe or whoever whispers in the voice of the politician and tells her “sube por la emigración”.

But is it true?

***

The reality is that the PIB is not suffering “because of immigration”. Normally, PIB always suffers as population increases. It’s a pergrullada. And likewise there has been an increase in the number of nationals or immigrants.

So you can take the data (“GDP suffers”) and interpret it wrongly (“por la immigración”).

Because PIB is increasing a littlebut the population is growing manyIn fact, it does not improve (which is the idea to be expressed by this interpretation) until the emperorand: if the GDP increases by 1% but the population by 2%, it is empobreciéndote.

Because the one who grows is the one on the outside who improves a little in the previous life, but at the cost of the inside, who live worse than their fathers lived.

I’ll put it another way. It is much better that GDP increases by 1% if the population decreases by 2% than that GDP increases by 1% if the population increases by 2%..

Singapore with a population of six million is better than Nigeria with a population of 242 million.

Because PIB is just a number. But the goodness is palpable.

That is why it is customary for economic and cultural elites to oppose massive immigration.

Because they will pay a much lower cost for immigration than the middle and working class.

In general, it’s usually a bad idea to ignore what someone who gives you their opinions for free tells them.

If you don’t risk your skin, it’s not worth the point of view.

***

I tell you this politician that I tell you all the politicians who ask me the same thing.

That the immigration problem is not a cultural one (that’s how it goes).

The problem is the material (if it’s pastel).

Wondering what the Spanish think about immigration? Escucha a Carlos Hernández Quero.

This is from Vox. But he says that is what the “average Spaniard” thinks about this assumption. I have seen communist militants speak of Quero as “the proverb that understands what passes through the neighborhood.”

It is a sign of the theme of immigration I increased the level of ideologically transversal interest.

***

The problem for politicians is that the thesis that immigrants have come to save the economy does not sit well with any Spaniard who has bought it in a supermarket, taken public transport, checked lists of public health hopefuls or tried to buy a house.

For twenty years we have heard that immigrants came to save our economy.

And twenty years ago, public services are more saturated than ever.

Our salaries have been around for twenty years.

Public transport exceeded its very limited capacity.

Health and its workers collapsed.

The education system is a factory of mediocrity with a degree.

Renting or buying a house is literally impossible unless you inherited it.

The feeling that Spain is a country of several thousand people, even more than those who live in it, brings many citizens to join for the first time in many years. on a personal situation with what you see your alredador.

And this is not “looking for a scapegoat”. It lives in real Spain.

***

I also tell you this politician whom I have seen time and again with my elder.

In Spain in 2026, no one who wants to live on high Spanish salaries can buy an apartment to sleep in without the help of their family.

In other words, you can buy a Zule in a suburb of Madrid with similar crime rates to Barcelona or Bilbao. And I am making a huge financial effort for three years.

But you can’t buy a house that your European counterparts, those with a similar professional level to you, buy in London, Rome or Berlin.

***

So ask about this offensive case. “We are fine, where are we going?”.

The usual mentality of the people of average Spain. Matching the installment peeling with the next installment for the churro.

Sumision learned.

***

The issue of immigration will not be able to be voiced in the next general election. Three more reasons because Pedro Sánchez I will ponder this over the table with the hope that the divisions between Vox and PP will blossom.

So whoever wants to win the election will keep talking about immigration whether they want to or not.

Which applies to housing, healthcare, education, pensions and public transport. There is talk of a rural project that goes beyond “what comes is fachas” or “co vuelve Sánchez”.

But it will be a misunderstanding who interprets the idea that “Spain is a dead country and immigration is coming to save us”. Because this is a) mentira, b) defeatist, c) desesperanzador yd) in radical contrast to what the Spaniards are coming to their streets.

How many thousand more immigrants do we need in a country with three and a half thousand real paradises and two and a half thousand people living on a minimum living wage?

But what logic does it hold?

Would you vote for a candidate who tells you that your EU record-breaking country has no recourse unless it imports thousands of lower-class immigrants?

What confidence does this candidate have in his country, in his citizens and in his political project?

What is this candidate’s project for your country?

Are low-level workers earning less than €1,000 a month in low-value sectors such as agriculture or hospitality supporting the country?

***

The example he gives Eduardo Arriero en su book Immigrants? Yes, but qualified.

An immigrant from sub-Saharan Africa who comes to Spain for ten years, starts working in an inn, receives an average of 20,000 euros per year, has a continuous salary of sixty-six years and is guaranteed a minimum pension, will lead to a final net balance of -158,000 euros at the end of your life.

According to us, it will cost the rest of the Spaniards 158,000 euros. Yes, eat in white.

It is not easy to decide that he is a perfil, the immigrant who starts work from day one and must not do it until he is happy, He is optimistic about his possibilities.

Because in real life it’s perfil de best case scenario practically does not exist.

Y even siendo el best case scenario possible, with a negative balance.

***

And Arriero continues in his book:

“If you are born in Spain for ten years and spend your entire childhood and adolescence in the public education system, the deficit will increase until it exceeds -420,000 euros. And a family with two children who also study in the public system and are patrons. With similar work, the negative fiscal balance of the family unit will exceed an average of one million euros.”

We multiplied these calculations by ten thousand immigrants, for those who Pedro Sánchez they now claim to be three or even four thousand more through the regulation of illegal and domestic crimes.

The result is a landscape of peace. Long before the financial quiebra connects the social quiebra. Yes, I want to see our politicians.

See what interests me.

So now I insist on reminding myself of their places.